CALL TO AUDIENCE - At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Board on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Board members may ask Town staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Conceptual Design Review Board may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.

1. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE AND ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO FOR THE ENCANTADA AT STEAM PUMP APARTMENTS (OV1212-01)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Conceptual Site Plan

Attachment 3 - Alternative Parking Analysis

Attachment 4 - Neighbor Issues and Concerns/Applicant Responses and Neighbor letter

Attachment 5 - Conceptual Architecture

Attachment 6 - Neighborhood Meeting Summary

Attachment 7 - Anders Letter

The following public comment was made:

Bill Adler, Oro Valley Resident, commented on parking for the site, people and recreation ratio, window tinting and avoiding open stairwells.

2. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE FOR PROPOSED GAS STATION AND RESTAURANT (OV1211-14)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Applican't s Submittal: Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Landscape Plan

Attachment 3 - Conditional Use Permit: Conditions of Approval

Attachment 4 - Context Map

Attachment 5 - Neighbor Issues and Concers/Applicant Responses and Neighbor Letter

Attachment 6 - Applican'ts Submittal: Conceptual Architecture

The following public comments were made:

Jim Harrison, Oro Valley Resident, spoke in opposition of the Conceptual Site Plan

Michael Sanford, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: landscaping and pedestrian walkways.

Steve Jones, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: lighting, landscaping and noise, and pleased with the project.

Mike Prout, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on pedestrian walkway safety.

3. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING:

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Applicant's Submittal

Attachment 3 - Rooney Ranch Area D Sign Guidlines

Attachment 4 - Map of Rooney Ranch Area D

Attachment 5 - Table Comparing Existing Sign Guidelines

a. PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE CURRENT SIGN GUIDELINES FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV311-005)

b. A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV312-01)

Matt Michels, Senior Planner, presented the following:

-Request Summary: PAD Exemption & Master Sign Program (MSP)
-PAD Sign Exemption
-Rooney Ranch PAD
-Sign Code: PAD Exemption
-Conclusion/Recommendation

Mark Jones, applicant, representing Fluoresco Lighting and Signs, presented the following:

-Current Signs
-Proposed Signs
-Site Plan
-Sign Guidelines
-Color Palette

4. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR HOHOKAM MESA/VISTOSO TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 6 (OV1312-02)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Applicant's narrative and subdivision map

Attachment 2 - Architectural elevations and floor plans

Attachment 3 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 4 - Materials and color schemes

Michel Isles, applicant, representing Meritage Homes, presented a brief overview of architecture.

5. PLANNING MANAGER'S UPDATE (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)

ADJOURNMENT

Apr 10, 2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Regular Session

Full agenda
Share this video

CALL TO ORDER AT OR AFTER 6:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

CALL TO AUDIENCE - At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Board on any issue not listed on today's agenda. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, individual Board members may ask Town staff to review the matter, ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda, or respond to criticism made by speakers. However, the Conceptual Design Review Board may not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to Audience." In order to speak during "Call to Audience" please specify what you wish to discuss when completing the blue speaker card.

1. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE AND ALTERNATIVE PARKING RATIO FOR THE ENCANTADA AT STEAM PUMP APARTMENTS (OV1212-01)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Conceptual Site Plan

Attachment 3 - Alternative Parking Analysis

Attachment 4 - Neighbor Issues and Concerns/Applicant Responses and Neighbor letter

Attachment 5 - Conceptual Architecture

Attachment 6 - Neighborhood Meeting Summary

Attachment 7 - Anders Letter

The following public comment was made:

Bill Adler, Oro Valley Resident, commented on parking for the site, people and recreation ratio, window tinting and avoiding open stairwells.

2. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE FOR PROPOSED GAS STATION AND RESTAURANT (OV1211-14)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Applican't s Submittal: Conceptual Site Plan and Conceptual Landscape Plan

Attachment 3 - Conditional Use Permit: Conditions of Approval

Attachment 4 - Context Map

Attachment 5 - Neighbor Issues and Concers/Applicant Responses and Neighbor Letter

Attachment 6 - Applican'ts Submittal: Conceptual Architecture

The following public comments were made:

Jim Harrison, Oro Valley Resident, spoke in opposition of the Conceptual Site Plan

Michael Sanford, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: landscaping and pedestrian walkways.

Steve Jones, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on the following: lighting, landscaping and noise, and pleased with the project.

Mike Prout, Oro Valley Resident, voiced his concerns on pedestrian walkway safety.

3. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING:

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 2 - Applicant's Submittal

Attachment 3 - Rooney Ranch Area D Sign Guidlines

Attachment 4 - Map of Rooney Ranch Area D

Attachment 5 - Table Comparing Existing Sign Guidelines

a. PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE CURRENT SIGN GUIDELINES FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV311-005)

b. A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV312-01)

Mark Jones, applicant, representing Fluoresco Lighting and Signs, presented the following:

-Current Signs
-Proposed Signs
-Site Plan
-Sign Guidelines
-Color Palette

4. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR HOHOKAM MESA/VISTOSO TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 6 (OV1312-02)

Staff Report

Attachment 1 - Applicant's narrative and subdivision map

Attachment 2 - Architectural elevations and floor plans

Attachment 3 - Conditions of Approval

Attachment 4 - Materials and color schemes

a. PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE CURRENT SIGN GUIDELINES FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV311-005)

b. A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV312-01)

4. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR HOHOKAM MESA/VISTOSO TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 6 (OV1312-02)

Apr 10, 2012 Conceptual Design Review Board Regular Session

a. PAD EXEMPTION FROM THE CURRENT SIGN GUIDELINES FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV311-005)

b. A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR ROONEY RANCH AREA D (OV312-01)

4. REVIEW AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MODEL HOME ARCHITECTURE FOR HOHOKAM MESA/VISTOSO TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION IN RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 6 (OV1312-02)

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item