MINUTES
ORO VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR SESSION
December 2, 2009
ORO VALLEY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11000 N. LA CANADA DRIVE
 
REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER - 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL

PRESENT:
Paul Loomis, Mayor
K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor
Bill Garner, Council Member
Barry Gillaspie, Council Member
Al Kunisch, Council Member
Salette Latas, Council Member

Vice Mayor Carter attended the Executive Session via telephone.

EXECUTIVE SESSION AT OR AFTER 5:00 PM

MOTION: A motion was made by and seconded by to

MOTION carried, 6-0.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to go out of Executive Session at 5:30 p.m.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

RESUME REGULAR SESSION AT OR AFTER 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL

PRESENT:
Paul Loomis, Mayor
K.C. Carter, Vice Mayor
Bill Garner, Council Member
Barry Gillaspie, Council Member
Al Kunisch, Council Member
Salette Latas, Council Member

Council Member Carter attended the Regular Session via telephone.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Loomis led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

UPCOMING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS

Mayor Loomis requested a moment of silence in honor of Town employee Maria Zabaleta who passed away.

Communications Administrator Mary Davis reviewed the upcoming meetings and events.

COUNCIL REPORTS - No reports.

DEPARTMENT REPORTS

Communications Administrator Mary Davis reminded the audience of the Town’s holiday celebration to be held at Steam Pump Ranch on December 4th and 5th, 2009. 

Town Clerk Kathryn Cuvelier announced that due to several requests, copies of Town documents would be made available on CDs for a cost of $10.00 (if the record was already available in that specific format).

ORDER OF BUSINESS: MAYOR WILL REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE MEETING

Mayor Loomis announced that staff has requested that Item 10 be continued.  He also moved the Pause for Paws presentation ahead of the Call to Audience.

a.

PAUSE FOR PAWS


Pause for Paws, Lane Davidson from Foundation for Animals in Risk (FAIR )introduced puppies, Dandy and Daffodil.  She stated that they would be available for adoption in a few weeks at a local PetsMart.  Ms. Davidson also announced that FAIR was a not for profit organization that sought donations (monetary and/or food) and were in need of foster homes and volunteers. 

CALL TO AUDIENCE

Doug McKee, Oro Valley resident, spoke to the proposed merger of two local fire districts (Northwest Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District).  He stated that there would be a joint meeting at the El Conquistador Resort in the Turquoise Room #1.  He urged Oro Valley residents to attend the meeting on Friday, December 4, 2009 at 6:00 p.m.

Art Segal, Oro Valley resident, spoke to the proposed merger of two fire departments, Northwest Fire District and Golder Ranch Fire District.  He commented that if a consolidation took place, it would be advantageous to the fire districts but not to the residents as it would probably cost more for fire coverage.

PRESENTATION:

b.

PRESENTATION BY COUNCILMEMBER GILLASPIE REGARDING HIS ATTENDANCE AT THE ARIZONA TOWN HALL


Council Member Gillaspie reviewed his trip report to the 95th Arizona Town Hall, "Riding the Fiscal Roller Coaster... Government Revenue in Arizona".  He outlined the discussions regarding the current State deficit and economic crisis, causes and challenges, and developing a long term strategic plan that would include accountability, defined time tables and assignment of responsibilities. 

1.

CONSENT AGENDA


At the request of Council and staff, Mayor Loomis pulled Items A, J and L for discussion.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items A, J and L.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

A.

Minutes - 11-4-09; 11-09-09 (PULLED TO CONTINUE THE MINUTES OF 11/4/09)


Click here for the 11/04/09 minutes

Click here for 11/09/09 minutes

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve the minutes of November 9, 2009 and to continue the minutes of November 4, 2009 to the January 6, 2010 meeting.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

B.

Building Safety Monthly Activity Report - October 2009


Click here for Item B

C.

Coyote Run Monthly Transit Report - October 2009


Click here for Item C

D.

Police Report - October 2009


Click here for Item D

E.

Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitor’s Bureau Quarterly Report - July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009


Click here for Item E

F.

Informational update on the Pima Association of Governments Regional Transportation Authority PAG/RTA 2010-2015 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)


Click here for Item F

G.

Resolution No. (R)09 - 77 Amending Chapter 16, Section 16-1-7 of the Oro Valley Town Code, by establishing Parks and Recreation Facility Usage Fees


Click here for Item G

H.

Resolution No. (R)09 - 78 Amending the Town of Oro Valley Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual to update Policy 10, Attendance and Leaves


Click here for Item H

I.

Resolution No. (R)09 - 79 Authorizing and approving an agreement between the Town of Oro Valley, Arizona, Rocking K Holdings, LP and Rincon Valley Holdings, LP for conveyance of unpledged groundwater right extinguishment credits to the Town


Click here for Item I

J.

OV12-07-01B Approval of a one year extension from March 19, 2010 to March 19, 2011 of the development plan/preliminary plat approvals for the Innovation Commerce Campus development, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION)


Click here for Item J

Discussion followed regarding:
  - Plans for the property since one interested party was pulling out. 
  - Concerns that the property may be sold.
  - Looking for high-tech employers

Kim Acorn, Acorn Associates Architecture, commented that the economy was bad and plans for the next 2 years were volatile but there were no plans for a change in use.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Garner and seconded by Council Member Gillaspie to DENY OV12-07-01B, a one year extension of the development plan/ preliminary plat approvals for the Innovation Commerce Campus development, located at the northwest corner of Rancho Vistoso Boulevard and Vistoso Commerce Loop.

Further discussion followed regarding: 
  - Unique design of the development was based on a specific company’s intent to build on that property.  If those development plans have changed, then Council should review the development plan again.
 - If changes to a development plan/preliminary plat were 25% or greater, then new approvals of development plan/plat were required. 
 - There were no guarantees when a development plan/plat was completed that specific companies would move in. 
 - Questioned whether Council should deny an extension of time for the development of the plat.
 - Development plan did not regulate the uses other than what was allowed under the zoning requirements.  
 - The current development plan was grandfathered under the Town’s old landscaping codes.  New landscaping codes had been adopted including water harvesting which should be applied to a project of this scale.

MOTION carried, 4-2 with Mayor Loomis and Council Member Kunisch opposed.

K.

OV12-06-28B Approval of a two year extension from October 17, 2009 to October 17, 2011 of the development plan/preliminary plat approvals for the Plaza at Vistoso retail/office development on Parcel 5-U of Rancho Vistoso Neighborhood 5, located northeast of the intersection of Tangerine Road and Rancho Vistoso Boulevard


Click here for Item K

L.

OV5-09-08 Approval of artwork funding for an art proposal at James D. Kriegh Park located of Calle Concordia (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION)


Click here for Item L

Discussion followed regarding:
 - Town Code requirements to install artwork (proposed artwork at James D. Kriegh Park was not required per Code).
 - Maintenance of artwork projects was the responsibility of the property owner. 
 - Monies in the Town’s public art account should be used for maintenance of art projects.
  - Proposed artwork was a conceptual design at this time pending Council’s decision.

Mayor Loomis opened the floor for public comment.

Zev Cywan, Oro Valley resident and member of the Art Review Commission, commented on art project repairs/maintenance and the Zoning Code’s definition of public art.  He also addressed the fiscal problems facing the Town and questioned whether the Town should spend monies on such a project at this time.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to deny Item L.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

M.

Town Council Trip Reports


Click here for Item M

2.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FILLING OF COUNCIL VACANCY WITH TERM EFFECTIVE UNTIL JUNE 2, 2010


Click here for Item 2

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Latas to appoint Patricia Spoerl effective January 6, 2010 to fill the unexpired term on the Oro Valley Town Council effective until June 2, 2010.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

3.

TOWN COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE TOWN’S FINANCIAL AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009


Click here for Item 3

Interim Assistant Town Manager and Finance Director Stacy Lemos reported that the Town had completed the fiscal year 2008/09 audit and a clean audit opinion was issued with no negative findings.

Kera Badalamenti, Heinfeld, Meech and Company, P.C. presented an overview of the Town's 2008/09 Comprehensive Audit Financial Report (CAFR).

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to accept the Town's financial audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

4.

PUBLIC HEARING - LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION - HOME RULE OPTION Explanation: On November 18, 2009 the Council held the first of two required public hearings regarding the Alternative Expenditure Limitation, commonly referred to as the Home Rule Option. Tonight is the second public hearing.


Click here for Item 4

Interim Assistant Town Manager and Finance Director Stacey Lemos reported that tonight was the second required public hearing on the Alternative Expenditure Limitation (Home Rule Option).  She explained that every four years the Town was required to submit this ballot question to the voters to authorize the Town to set its budget limits locally.  She stated that the question would be placed on the Spring 2010 ballot and if approved, would allow the Town to spend all revenues received. 

Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.  There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed.

RECESS REGULAR SESSION - 7:02 p.m.

CONVENE SPECIAL SESSION

CALL TO ORDER - 7:02 p.m.

1.

RESOLUTION NO. (R)09 - 80 PROPOSING AN EXTENSION OF THE ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION - HOME RULE OPTION Explanation: An affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Town Council would allow the Home Rule Option to be placed on the March 9, 2010 election ballot. Without voter approval of the Home Rule Option on March 9, 2010, the Town Council would be limited to spending the state-imposed amounts even though revenues and other resources such as cash carryforwards are estimated to exceed the State-imposed amounts.


Click here for Special Session Item 1

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Gillaspie and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to approve Resolution (R)09-80, proposing an extension of the Local Alternative Expenditure Limitation.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

ADJOURN SPECIAL SESSION - 7:04 p.m.

RECONVENE REGULAR SESSION - 7:04 p.m.

(ITEM 5 WAS MOVED TO FOLLOW ITEM 7).

Click here for Item 5

6.

CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. (R)08 - 82 OV11-08-04 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO, NEIGHBORHOOD 5, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY BIG WASH, ON THE SOUTH BY TANGERINE ROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY THE RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (Continued from November 4, 2009)


Click here for Item 6

Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka reviewed the Council Communication and highlighted the following:
- Goals of General Plan amendment:
    - Relocate school site
    - Maintain existing development rights
    - Maintain majority of golf course acreage
    - Widen Honeybee Wash Corridor

He then reviewed the existing and proposed General Plan land use maps, land use proposal and the golf course designation.

Paul Oland of The WLB Group, represented Vistoso Partners, and reviewed the proposed parcel changes for Rancho Vistoso, Neighborhood 5 General Plan amendment and summarized the following:
  - Consistent with Town’s General Plan goals and policies
  - Consistent with Amphitheater School District’s intentions (Title work has been completed)
  - No increase to number of housing units  (proposed reduction to Neighborhood 5 unit cap from 3,555 to 2,500)
  - Preserves the intent of the proposed golf course
  - Parcel 5-D to be designated as Open Space adjacent to Honeybee Park
  - Significantly widens Honeybee Wash corridor

Mr. Oland identified the Town staff condition regarding installation of a sewer line connection up to Parcel B.  He commented that Vistoso Partners did not have a problem extending the sewer line up to Sun City; however, they have asked that the requirement for the extension to Parcel B be deleted as they were not involved in the development of that property.  Mr. Oland also explained that the Improvement Plan states that the developer of that property would be responsible for connecting to that lift station.

Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.

Doug McKee, Oro Valley resident, commented that as the Town grows, there would be a need for another golf course.  He stated that the proposed
amendment retained the intent of the golf course but reduced acreage to a point that may not allow for a golf course to be built in the future.  He suggested designating the open area at the north end of the property as an either/or combination of open space and golf course so that there would be the option to place the golf course in the open space.

Mayor Loomis closed the public hearing.

MOTION: A motion was made by and seconded by to

Discussion followed regarding:
 - Maintaining the golf course area as natural open space (Gillaspie)
 - Developer would have to come back to Council if they wanted to build a golf course in the future (Gillaspie)
 - Water "budget" for proposed golf course (Mayor Loomis) - (Developer of a new golf course would be required to use reclaimed water resources and add additional reclaimed water lines and install pumps in order to meet the demand for the reclaimed water use.)
 - Future golf course was promised to residents (Mayor Loomis)
 - Natural open space is consistent with General Plan policies and as economic conditions change, the plan could be amended (Gillaspie)

MOTION carried, 5-1 with Council Member Gillaspie opposed.

Mayor Loomis recessed the meeting at 7:35 p.m.  The meeting resumed at 7:45 p.m.

7.

CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. (O)09-19 OV9-09-01 AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD FIVE, GENERALLY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY BIG WASH, ON THE SOUTH BY TANGERINE ROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY RANCHO VISTOSO BOULEVARD (Continued from November 4, 2009) Explanation: The WLB Group on behalf of Vistoso Partners is requesting approval of a Planned Area Development (PAD) amendment.


Click here for Item 7

Senior Planner Matt Michels reviewed the Council Communication, existing and proposed land use maps and the tentative development plan.  He then highlighted the following:
 ~ Town policy provides for conformance between the General Plan and Zoning
 ~ Goals of amendment:
    - Relocate school site
    - Maintain existing development rights
    - Maintain majority of Golf course acreage
    - Widen Honeybee Wash Corridor

Mr. Michels stated that staff recommended approval of the Planned Area Development (PAD) amendment with conditions as listed in Exhibit "A".

Paul Oland, The WLB Group, representing Vistoso Partners, stated that they are requesting approval of the PAD amendment to be in conformance with the Town’s approved General Plan.

Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.  There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed.

MOTION: A motion was made by and seconded by to

MOTION carried, 6-0.

5.

UPDATE AND DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL TOWN ANNEXATION AREAS (CONTINUED FROM 11/18/09)


Special Projects Coordinator Scott Nelson reviewed the annexation area study map and highlighted the following:
 - No current requests for annexation
 - Focus on three study areas:
    - Arroyo Grande (State parcels outside of general planning area)
    - State land parcels to the west of Town (in Marana’s general planning area)
    - Catalina Citrus Estates (30 property owners, commercial and residential and includes Tohono Chul Park)

(No action required).

8.

PUBLIC HEARING: OV9-09-03, THE WLB GROUP, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNERS, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. (O) 08-02, A PAD AMENDMENT FOR PORTIONS OF RANCHO VISTOSO NEIGHBORHOOD 3. SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEADLINE CONTAINED IN PUBLIC WORKS CONDITION #3 IN THE EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REQUIRING THE EXTENSION OF VISTOSO VILLAGE DRIVE FROM JUNE 2010 TO A DATE PRIOR TO ANY ADDITIONAL LAND USE ON THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE ROAD EXTENSION, AS DETERMINED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER


Click here for Item 8

Acting Planning and Zoning Director Paul Popelka explained that the property owners requested that a zoning condition that would require that Vistoso Village Drive be extended by June 2010, be amended.  Staff suggested that the road extension requirement be removed and that the Town Engineer determine when the road should be extended.

Mayor Loomis opened the public hearing.  There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed.

MOTION: A motion was made by and seconded by to

MOTION carried, 6-0.

9.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE OPTIONS FOR THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY


Click here for Item 9

Transit Administrator Aimee Ramsey reviewed current services being performed by Sun Shuttle and Coyote Run.  She then presented options for Council’s consideration:
- Three scenarios:
    Option A - Leave Coyote Run alone
     - No service changes to Oro Valley residents
     - Least amount of savings
     - Quality and service control

   Option B - Transform Coyote Run into Sun Run
     - Town managed, quality control, staff retention, continued utilization of volunteers
     - General public transportation no longer limited to seniors and ADA
     - Operation policies set by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
     - Development of Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
     - Seniors travel options change
     - ADA passengers moved to another provider

  Option C - Eliminate Coyote Run:  RTA to contract Transit Services
    - RTA managed and operated, service quality unknown, no local control or decision options
    - General public transportation
    - Operational policies set by the RTA
    - Seniors travel options change
    - ADA and senior passengers moved to another provider
    - Staff future unknown

Ms. Ramsey reviewed the financial impacts for each option and then highlighted outstanding issues as follows:
    - Fare and revenue sharing
    - Service operations (operational policies)
    - Technology integration
    - Customer services and our residents
    - State funds

Council discussion followed regarding: specific Sun Shuttle routes, impact to residents, level and quality of services to meet citizen needs, continue to look at options, RTA was not ready to commit to further funding at this time, and look into running Coyote Run as an Enterprise Fund.

Jim Degrood, RTA Transportation Services Director, commented that Sun Shuttle Route 402 was disappointing and that they were looking at improvements for the Oracle Road services. He further commented that they were open to investigating what would best serve Oro Valley. 

Council encouraged further research into options for Coyote Run and asked that staff continue to keep the Council informed. 

10.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL REPORT OF THE LIBRARY REVIEW COMMITTEE


Click here for Item 10

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Latas and seconded by Council Member Kunisch to continue Item 10 to the January 6, 2010 Council meeting.

MOTION carried, 6-0.

11.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS


Council Member Kunisch, Seconded by Council Member Latas - Direction to the Town Attorney to look at 1% for art (Funds possibly be split - half to art and half to cultural resource preservation)

Council Member Garner, Seconded by Council Member Kunisch - Direct staff to come back at future Study Session with information on setting Coyote Run as an Enterprise Fund

Council Member Kunisch, Seconded by Council Member Garner - Add to Planning and Zoning Work Plan - Ordinance/Code amendment for maintenance/repair of public art

CALL TO AUDIENCE - No speakers.

ADJOURNMENT

MOTION: A motion was made by Vice Mayor Carter and seconded by Council Member Garner to adjourn at 9:02 p.m. 

MOTION carried, 6-0.