|
Vote: 7 - 0 Carried |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §9-463.05, TO DISCUSS AND REVIEW AN UPDATE TO THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT FEES CHARGED BY THE TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
|
|
Strategic Initiatives Manager Amanda Jacobs gave a brief overview of item #3 and introduced Carson Bise, President of Tischler Bise.
Mr. Bise presented item #3 and included the following:
- 40-year consulting practice serving local government nationwide
- Methodology Overview
- Legal and Methodology
- Arizona Legislation
- Overview of Adoption Process
- Land use Assumptions
- Parks and Recreation
- Projection of Demand: Developed Park Land
- Projection of Demand: Amenities
- Draft Parks and Recreational Development Fees
- Police
- Police Station Cost Recovery
- Projection of Demand
- Draft Police Development Fee
- Streets
- Streets IIP
- Travel Demand
- Proposed Streets Development Fees
- Water
- Water IIP
- Proposed Water Facilities Development Fees
- Utility Fee Comparison:Current vs. Proposed
- Town Fee Comparison: Current vs. Proposed
- SF Unit Fee Comparison: Other Communities |
|
Mayor Winfield opened the public hearing.
No comments were received.
Mayor Winfield closed the public hearing.
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #3.
Ms. Jacobs concluded the presentation and stated the item would come back to Council on February 19th for discussion and possible action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
|
|
Councilmember Piña requested that a portrait of Chief Sharp, painted by resident Harry Green, be presented at a future meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALL TO AUDIENCE
|
|
No comments were received. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR SESSION
|
|
Mayor Winfield adjourned the Regular Session at 7:48 p.m.
Mayor Winfield recessed the meeting at 7:49 p.m.
Mayor Winfield reconvened the meeting at 8:01 p.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STUDY SESSION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALL TO ORDER
|
|
Mayor Winfield called the Study Session to order at 8:01 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
DISCUSSION REGARDING A PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC EXPANSION ZONE, SECTION 24.9 AND SECTION 22.10
|
|
Community and Economic Development Director JJ Johnston and Principal Planner Milini Simms presented item #1 and included the following:
- Purpose
- Meet Economic Goals and Strategies
- Proposed Code Amendment
- Economic Expansion Zone
- Allow Shovel-Ready Sites
- Require Public Open Houses
- Admin. Approval of all Code Compliant Plans
- Eliminate 20-Day Town Council Review Period
- General Plan Conformance
- Planning and Zoning Commission
- Summary and Feedback
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding Study Session item #1. |
|
The following individual spoke regarding Study Session item #1.
Developer Tom Warne |
|
Discussion continued amongst Council and staff regarding Study Session item #1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS TO C-1, C-2, AND TECHNOLOGICAL PARK AND EQUIVALENT PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS REGARDING LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUCH AS BUILDING HEIGHTS, SETBACKS, ETC.
|
|
Principal Planner Milini Simms presented Study Session item #2 and included the following:
- Purpose
- Meet Economic Goals and Strategies
- Proposed Code Amendments
- Expand available property for employers
- Low-impact employment uses
- Expand available property for employers
- Update standards and reduce discrepancies
- Building size
- Permitted and ancillary uses
- Ancillary uses
- Building heights
- Proposed building height - Rancho Vistoso
- Proposed building height - La Reserve
- Architectural features
- Increase predictability
- Remove unintended barriers
- General Plan Conformance
- Planning and Zoning Commission
- Summary and Feedback
Discussion ensued amongst Council and staff regarding item #2. |